Quick screen of a domestic driveway grade against commonly cited AS/NZS 2890.1 limits.
| Driveway grade |
%
Steepest section of the ramp (magnitude)
|
|---|---|
| Change of grade (optional) |
%
Algebraic grade difference at a break point, e.g. +10% to −5% = 15%
|
| Break type |
| Grade | — |
|---|---|
| Max grade check | — |
| Change-of-grade check | — |
| Overall | — |
| Item | Limit |
|---|---|
| Max driveway grade (domestic) | 1 in 4 = 25% |
| Max change of grade at a summit/crest without a transition | 12.5% (1 in 8) |
| Max change of grade at a sag without a transition | 15% (1 in 6.7) |
| Transition length where a transition is required | min ~2.0 m (typically at half the grade change) |
Important: This is a screening aid only. The actual AS/NZS 2890.1 standard, ground-vehicle clearance checks (Appendix C templates) and — critically — the relevant council / authority requirements take precedence and are often stricter (many QLD councils prefer a working maximum near 1 in 5 = 20%). A "Review" result flags that a transition or engineering assessment is likely needed, not that the design is illegal. For reference and checking only — verify with a qualified engineer.
A driveway that is too steep — or that changes grade too abruptly — will scrape the underside of a car, be unsafe in the wet, and fail to gain approval. In Australia, domestic driveway gradients are governed by AS/NZS 2890.1 (parking facilities / off-street car parking), which sets both a maximum grade and limits on how quickly the grade is allowed to change at crests and dips. This checker screens a driveway grade — and, optionally, a change of grade at a break point — against the limits commonly cited from that standard, so you can see early whether a design is likely to pass or need a transition. It answers the everyday question, "is this driveway too steep, and do I need a transition where it flattens out?"
Most people think only about the maximum grade (how steep the steepest section is). But the second factor — change of grade at a break point — is what actually causes vehicles to bottom out. Where a steep ramp meets a flatter section (at the top of a driveway, or in a dip at the gutter), the algebraic difference between the two grades matters. A ramp going from +12% up to −5% down has a change of grade of 17%, even though neither grade on its own is extreme. If that change happens over too short a distance, the car's front or rear overhang, or its belly, grounds out. That is why the standard limits change of grade separately, and why a transition (a short intermediate grade) is required where the change is too great.
The key figures widely quoted for AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 are summarised in the table near the top of this page: a maximum domestic driveway grade of 1 in 4 (25%), a maximum change of grade without a transition of 12.5% at a crest and 15% at a sag, and a minimum transition length of about 2.0 m (often at half the grade change). The standard itself, and the ground-clearance vehicle templates in its appendices, take precedence for any real design — obtain the current standard rather than relying on the summary above.
This is the part designers miss. Even where a driveway passes AS/NZS 2890.1, the local council or authority requirements usually take precedence and are frequently stricter. Many QLD councils prefer a working maximum closer to 1 in 5 = 20% and have their own standard drawings for driveway crossovers and vehicular access. A "PASS" against the cited standard is a screening result, not an approval — always check the applicable council standard drawing and planning scheme codes before finalising a crossover or access design.
AS/NZS 2890.1 Parking facilities — Off-street car parking (domestic driveway gradients and grade-change transitions); the applicable local council / authority standard drawings for vehicular crossovers and access (which frequently govern and are often stricter); and, for the frontage, the relevant road authority requirements. This checker is a screening aid only — it does not reproduce the standard, and a REVIEW result flags that a transition or engineering assessment is likely needed, not that a design is non-compliant.